Medium Weight Rohloff Tourer
Categories
RECENT POSTS
SKARPER electric assist review
I was one of the first to order a Skarper electric assist device as promoted ...
Making Head Tube Cutters UPDATED
For my last three frame projects I chose a tapered head tube for a tapered ...
Proxxon Belt Sander
I recently purchased this 240v hand held belt sander, and wished I had done this ...
Archives
Tags
Related Posts
A Bolt-On Top Tube
16 December 2020
1 Comment
This is a frame alteration I could not have imagined needing to do, until back in 2015 I was ...
Making a template to mitre Seat Stays
30 November 2015
No Comments
I wish there was a clever software program to produce mitre templates for complex seat stay mitres. However it ...
Closure of The Bicycle Academy
2 December 2022
No Comments
Many may have already have heard about the closure of the Bicycle Academy in Frome, which came as an ...







2 thoughts on “Medium Weight Rohloff Tourer”
Hi there, I’d be really interested to know which ‘R’ fork blades you went for, and how have they performed with a load? I’m building a similar style tourer and am finding information on suitable fork blades hard to come by. Thanks, Ben.
Helllo Ben, I got the forks from Ceeway and I was unaware there was more than one type of R designation, other than perhaps bent versus straight. I am sure mine are bent with 45mm rake which was described as a touring fork. I know that 853 and 953 are not suitable for discs or possibly front panniers. I think in fact the R forks from Ceeway are 631, as Reynolds don’t list anything else. Regarding use I have to admit I have never fitted front panniers or used the bike for full on touring like I had originally intended so I have only ridden it lightly loaded for day rides. No issues over several years though. I used v brakes, but the original thorn mercury I took the idea from had front v and rear disc. If you are going to use discs the disc brake forks from ceeway are 631, so to my mind 631 is probably the best option. Sorry I can’t be more precise.