Medium Weight Rohloff Tourer
Categories
RECENT POSTS
SKARPER electric assist review
I was one of the first to order a Skarper electric assist device as promoted ...
Making Head Tube Cutters UPDATED
For my last three frame projects I chose a tapered head tube for a tapered ...
Proxxon Belt Sander
I recently purchased this 240v hand held belt sander, and wished I had done this ...
Archives
Tags
Related Posts
Closure of The Bicycle Academy
2 December 2022
No Comments
Many may have already have heard about the closure of the Bicycle Academy in Frome, which came as an ...
Drawing Frames by Hand
29 April 2014
No Comments
After completing an initial frame building course I did not really have much idea about how to design a ...
Servicing a Model W Gas Fluxer
15 May 2015
4 Comments
I have been running my Gas Fluxer now for 2 years before the gas pressure dropped right off and ...







2 thoughts on “Medium Weight Rohloff Tourer”
Hi there, I’d be really interested to know which ‘R’ fork blades you went for, and how have they performed with a load? I’m building a similar style tourer and am finding information on suitable fork blades hard to come by. Thanks, Ben.
Helllo Ben, I got the forks from Ceeway and I was unaware there was more than one type of R designation, other than perhaps bent versus straight. I am sure mine are bent with 45mm rake which was described as a touring fork. I know that 853 and 953 are not suitable for discs or possibly front panniers. I think in fact the R forks from Ceeway are 631, as Reynolds don’t list anything else. Regarding use I have to admit I have never fitted front panniers or used the bike for full on touring like I had originally intended so I have only ridden it lightly loaded for day rides. No issues over several years though. I used v brakes, but the original thorn mercury I took the idea from had front v and rear disc. If you are going to use discs the disc brake forks from ceeway are 631, so to my mind 631 is probably the best option. Sorry I can’t be more precise.